Effulgence- Bi- annual Management Journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. Conformance to standards of ethical behaviour is in this manner expected of all gatherings included: Authors, Editors and Reviewers. Journal takes its obligations of guardianship over all phases of distributing very genuinely and we perceive our moral and different duties. Effulgence- Bi- annual Management focused on guaranteeing that promoting, republish or other business income has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.

DUTIES OF EDITORS:


Decision on the Publication of Articles:-The Editors of Journal are responsible for choosing which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The Editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board. The Editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in settling on this choice.

Fair play:-Manuscripts shall be assessed exclusively on their intellectual merit without regard to authors' gender, race, sexual orientation, ethnic origin, religious belief, citizenship, or political philosophy.

Confidentiality:-The Editors and any editorial staff must not reveal any data about a submitted composition to anybody other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest:- Unpublished materials unveiled in a submitted original copy must not be utilized by any individual who has a view of the manuscript (while handling it) in his or her own research without the express written consent of the author.

DUTIES OF REVIEWERS:


Contribution of Peer Review:-Peer review assists the editors and the editorial board in making editorial decisions while editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the manuscript.

Promptness:-Any selected referee who feels unfit to review the assigned manuscript or unable to provide a prompt review should notify the editor and excuse him/her from the review process.

Confidentiality:-Manuscripts got for survey must be treated as classified records. They should not be appeared to, or talked about with, others aside from as approved by the Editor in Chief.

Norms of Objectivity:- Reviews should be conducted objectively. There shall be no personal criticism of the author. Reviewers should communicate their perspectives plainly with supporting contentions.

Conflict of Interest:-Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

DUTIES OF AUTHORS::


Reporting standards:-Authors of reports of original research should introduce an exact record of the work proceeded just as a target conversation of its centrality. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the manuscript. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Deceitful or purposely wrong articulations comprise dishonest conduct and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention:-Authors may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such, if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism:-Authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have utilized the work and additionally expressions of others this must be suitably referred to or cited.

Multiple Publications:- An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Presenting a similar original copy to more than one journal simultaneously establishes deceptive distributing conduct and is unsatisfactory.

Acknowledgement of Sources:-Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper:-Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.

Corresponding Author:-An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgment of Funding Sources:-Sources of funding for the research reported in the article should be duly acknowledged at the end of the manuscript.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest:- All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works:-When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author's obligation to promptly notify the journal editor and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the manuscript.

* Effulgence-Bi- annual Management Journal is an open access journal is freely available in online mode.